Skip to content
the canDIshhh tales
Menu
  • Home
  • Food
    • Cooking Quest
    • Eats
    • Travel
  • Mommyhood
    • Yaya Diaries
    • Birth Stories
    • Breastfeeding Posts
  • DIDIscoveries
  • About Me
Menu

LTFRB RECALLS PETITION FOR EXEMPTION for Private (NOT FOR HIRE) TRUCKS!

Posted on August 9, 2014 by Didi

UPDATE:  August 16, 2014 Here’s the ACTUAL Memo recalling the previous Memo  
https://candishhh.com/2014/08/ltfrb-memorandum-circular-2014-14.html —————- This means that THERE IS NO NEED TO FILE A PETITION FOR EXEMPTION! There is LIGHT at the end of the tunnel for all privately owned trucks that are NOT FOR HIRE!! Here’s the LATEST tweet from the LTFRB Chairman Ginez:

Here is the official link:

Filing of Application for Exemption of Privately-Owned Trucks no longer required. LTFRB will recall Memo Circular No. 2014-11 dated 7/15/14.

— Official LTFRB (@LTFRB) August 9, 2014

So glad that I was browsing Twitter at this exact time.. So there you have it readers!! 🙂 NO NEED TO FILE A PETITION FOR EXEMPTION for Privately owned NOT FOR HIRE trucks!! To the law firm that has posted numerous advertisements to my comment section – are you going to refund those who sought you assistance? Yehey!! Update:  August 11, 2014 9:12AM  (please refer to the Twitter Account of @LTFRB_Chairman)

Category: Uncategorized

32 thoughts on “LTFRB RECALLS PETITION FOR EXEMPTION for Private (NOT FOR HIRE) TRUCKS!”

  1. Anonymous says:
    August 10, 2014 at 3:49 pm

    thanks a lot sa info..it means wla khit anong ipa file ang private trucks?hoping n alam yan ng mga manghuhuli.cross fingers prin.

    Reply
  2. Didi says:
    August 11, 2014 at 2:28 am

    Hi Anonymous! You are most welcome!! 🙂 I'm sure hindi pa nila alam since Saturday night palang na-i-tweet. Pero hindi naman sila pwede manghuli since may extension yung until August 29 to comply. So if mahuli kayo – nangongotong lang iyon.

    Reply
  3. Anonymous says:
    August 11, 2014 at 9:21 am

    hi! thank you for this! =)
    btw. just wanna make clear…

    for example..
    im a corporation, ang need ko lang gawin is..lahat lang ng delivery trucks should be under my corporate name? tama? as in un lang gagawin ko?

    thank you so much!

    Godbless You!

    Reply
  4. Anonymous says:
    August 11, 2014 at 9:39 am

    hello, buti naman
    narecall nila magpafile na sana kami…talaga naman pabigat sa maliliit na negosyante yun ..

    Reply
  5. Didi says:
    August 11, 2014 at 10:01 am

    You are most welcome!!

    I think kelangan under your corporate name BUT I am not sure rin ha. Better ask the LTFRB – or better, since hindi na kelangan ito. Abangan natin yung bagong Memorandum Circular.

    Thanks din for commenting! Sana nagiiwan kayo ng Pangalan para naman makapagreply ako ng mabuti sa inyo!

    Love, Didi

    Reply
  6. Didi says:
    August 11, 2014 at 10:02 am

    Hi Anonymous!

    Buti nalang na-recall! Hindi na sayang oras, effort and pera!!

    Love, Didi

    Reply
  7. Anonymous says:
    August 11, 2014 at 10:21 am

    Thank You for your humbly response Ms. Didi, btw, izha here =)

    Hm.. ang prob ko kasi.. need gumawa ng bagong Deed of Sale.. but ang prob is patay na ung seller. kasai super tagal na ng truck namin… elementary pa ko nung binili nmin to…

    hmm…

    Fingerscrossed.=)

    Reply
  8. Didi says:
    August 11, 2014 at 11:39 am

    Hi Izha! 🙂 Oh… Pag ganyan kelangan na natin i-consult sa lawyer or experts!

    I'm keeping my fingers crossed for you!!

    Love, Didi

    Reply
  9. Anonymous says:
    August 11, 2014 at 12:24 pm

    Thanks a lot. This is really helpful

    Reply
  10. Anonymous says:
    August 12, 2014 at 1:52 am

    Hi Sana maglabas na agad ng bagong memorandum and ltfrb soon…

    Reply
  11. grace tan says:
    August 12, 2014 at 5:31 am

    THANK YOU!!! i just finished completing the documents required buti na lang binawi na ito. pabigat sa mga small/medium enterprises. Government agency don't study the pro and cons of their policies which greatly affect PH economy. (e.g. truck ban: now we feel the effect of this taas nanaman prices of goods) agad agad may ganito ganyan… wala man lang time frame of policy or experimental period

    Reply
  12. Anonymous says:
    August 12, 2014 at 8:05 am

    Just came back from LTFRB. Yes, the stupid memo was recalled. Drivers of private trucks should only present three items to the apprehending officer:

    1. Vehicle OR/CR
    2. DTI/SEC registration
    3. Official Receipt if the truck is used to procure items or Delivery Receipts if the truck is used to deliver items.

    All three must be under THE SAME NAME

    Also, only LTO and LTFRB are authorized to apprehend colorum vehicles unless MMDA and local patrols can present mission orders.

    Reply
  13. Anonymous says:
    August 12, 2014 at 11:06 am

    Thanks for recalling LTFRB MC 2014-011. This time, can DENR and other gov't agencies recall the issued order on Smoke Belching? Nagaging palabigasan ito ng mga smoke belcher enforcers.
    Dillema rin ito ng mga truck operators. Ang mababang lagayan ay Php500.00 kada huli.

    Reply
  14. Unknown says:
    August 14, 2014 at 8:27 am

    Hi!.. Ask ko lng po kung san makikita ang memo at kung totoo po ba na buburahin na yun pangalan ng sasakyan at mtitira na lang un capacity? At ano pi ba un invoice san makukuha un. Salamat s pagtugon

    Reply
  15. Anonymous says:
    August 14, 2014 at 10:03 am

    Thank heavens that these officials finally came to their senses. Some fixers are already having a heyday after this MC came out. Finally, the monkey is off our backs. I've been actually having sleepless nights regarding this matter..Same with apprehending smoke belchers,it is just an absurd ruling.

    Reply
  16. Anonymous says:
    August 15, 2014 at 3:05 am

    Have they issued the new guidelines for the private trucks or a memo at least? I talked with MMDA Operations department and they are not aware of the recall of 2014-011. They insist that green plates must either have a PA or a Certificate of Exemption. Also, you cannot just brandish a claim that MMDA officers have no right to apprehend for colorum because if they insist on taking out your plates you cannot do anything (MMDA is not under LTFRB), especially since, if you complain at their office in Orense, the people there will insist that MMDA has the right to apprehend colorum.

    Reply
  17. Didi says:
    August 15, 2014 at 3:18 am

    Welcome!!

    Reply
  18. Didi says:
    August 15, 2014 at 3:19 am

    Maglalabas daw within the week, but its already Friday and wala parin..

    Reply
  19. Didi says:
    August 15, 2014 at 3:27 am

    Welcome!! To be honest, kung kailangan naman at may reason, susunod naman tayo diba? Ang ayoko lang is paiba iba PLUS hindi pa pinapaalam sa lahat. Selected few lang..

    Reply
  20. Didi says:
    August 15, 2014 at 3:29 am

    Thank you so much for this!! 🙂

    Nako, MMDA pa naman mahilig manghuli. Honestly, I think all agencies are very 'ata' na manghuli.

    Thanks again for this! I hope you left your name so I can say THANK YOU properly!

    Reply
  21. Didi says:
    August 15, 2014 at 3:30 am

    Yung Smoke Belching – dapat may guidelines yan. Kasi yung mga nanghuhuli, pipilitin na you are violating kahit na pasado sa lahat ng tests. Yung huling bomba lang yung failed. Crazy diba?

    Reply
  22. Didi says:
    August 15, 2014 at 3:30 am

    HI Karen! Wala parin yung memo kasi pinapipirmahan pa raw. So wait muna tayo.
    Thanks!!

    Reply
  23. Didi says:
    August 15, 2014 at 3:31 am

    Monkeys will always be there naman. Its just a matter of ridding them all or ignoring them.

    Smoke Belching is another issue nga.

    Reply
  24. Didi says:
    August 15, 2014 at 3:37 am

    Within the week daw ang issuehan ng memo but its already Friday, we're all waiting for it parin.

    As for the colorum – in my opinion, if colorum talaga – they should be caught. No questions asked yan.

    But with the apprehension – parang lumalabas free for all yung ginagawa nila. They don't care which agnecy issued it as long as their agency said they can – they can and they will. that's the problem with our system. Hindi siya UNIFIED. Kanya kanyang rules and regulations per agency.

    Reply
  25. Anonymous says:
    August 15, 2014 at 7:13 am

    That's going to be a problem starting tomorrow since the MMDA office said they will start apprehending tomorrow. This is the scenario:

    You have a private truck (with green plate). You do not have a Certificate of Exemption (because LTFRB did not issue any). Your truck is carrying your own cargo. The driver brings the OR, the DR, the SEC or DTI papers (all consistently bearing the name of the company). The MMDA apprehends you and asks for either a PA or a Certificate of Exemption. You only present the OR, DR and SEC certificate, which of course the MMDA will not recognize because there is no official memo that this is the new guideline of the LTFRB. The MMDA officers declares you are a colorum operator and starts to remove your plate. You next claim that the MMDA is not authorized to apprehend you for that kind of violation because only LTFRB deputized officers know the new guidelines. They insist they have that authority. You have 2 choices.

    1. Let them take your plates under protest and subject yourself to adjudication. But the adjudication will be under the MMDA and using their rules (who do you think will prevail).
    2. Pay the MMDA officer whatever they ask so they will let you go.

    The same thing will happen with the local traffic officers like the MTB officers in Manila, the Green boys in QC, etc.

    So, will we risk allowing our trucks to travel starting tomorrow?

    Reply
  26. Anonymous says:
    August 16, 2014 at 11:49 am

    Hello!! Sana maglamas n sila ng memo para nmn my panlaban tayo s mga ng huhuli , like mmda or lto . Sk para hindi tyo nangangapa sa dilim. Till now wl pa din s web site ng ltfrb ang cnsv n memo

    Reply
  27. Anonymous says:
    August 20, 2014 at 6:58 am

    meron na sa LTFRB website – MC 2014-014 about sa Recall of MC 2014-011 RE: acceptance for filing application / petition for exemption.

    Reply
  28. pisopanalo says:
    August 20, 2014 at 8:46 am

    Good to hear. d2 kc samin sa TPL Car insurance Manila North eh tinatanong, wla p kming update s balitang yan. buti n lang sir. tnx.

    Reply
  29. Anonymous says:
    August 27, 2014 at 7:23 am

    The memo says that the LTFRB will stop accepting applications for exemption. But this memo is incomplete. What will those private trucks (used for own businesses) do now if the MMDA apprehends them on the road? A typical scenario would be if an MMDA or police officer stops a loaded green plate vehicle. The apprehending officers charges colorum. The driver claims cargo is for own use of the truck owner and presents invoice and DR as proof. The apprehending officer could easily not honor them because there is no specific memo that they will be acceptable proof. This is how enforcers make money – ambiguous laws and memos.

    Reply
  30. MC says:
    October 7, 2014 at 12:02 pm

    Pls update on this. what do we do if the apprehending officer will not honor the documents presented. should we still apply for CPC to be sure? thank you in advance..

    Reply
  31. Anonymous says:
    October 29, 2014 at 9:12 am

    So this is what happens now on the street as we have experienced with our trucks. In Pasig 1 week ago, our truck was apprehended by MMDA officers. They were asking for a PA (provisional authority), our driver said it is a private truck hauling private cargo and showed the DR as proof along with CR/OR. The MMDA officer is asking for Certificate of Exemption, so our driver said the LTFRB suspended issuance of the exemption. The officer said in which case, since we have no PA and no CE, we are colorum and threatened to remove the truck plate. He said we can argue our case at the MMDA office but offered to help us for 1000. We wanted to argue the case but if we do that, they will take the plate number and we will wait for a hearing schedule. If we do that, we cannot use the truck until the case is resolved which means we have to hire a truck while we await hearing. This is going to be expensive so we just paid the P1000.
    Then on Saturday evening another truck of ours got apprehended by MMDA officers accompanied by some policemen at the intersection of Commonwealth Ave and University Ave (UP). The enforcers also claimed the truck is colorum (same reason, no PA, no CE). At that time the truck is not even loaded but the driver still had the DR from that delivery. Again the officers threatened to remove the plates but are willing to settle for P300.00. The officers are wearing black jacket covering their nameplates. When I called the MMDA hotline, the MMDA hotline said they have no team assigned at that location so it's probably an LGU group but I told them our drivers recognize the MMDA uniform under the black jacket and asked them to investigate. The MMDA said we should report this instead to the nearest police station. But I told them the MMDA officer has several policemen with them. They insisted we report that to the police station. We settled the P300.00

    Again last Sunday, another truck of ours got apprehended along Mindanao Avenue near Sauyo. Same violation, colorum. They did not bother to look at the DR and import documents, they only wanted to see a PA or EC. They settled for P300.00.

    I finally decided to call the MMDA complaint desk. However, even the MMDA complaint desk insists that during their last seminar, the officers are only told to look for the PA or EC. She said no memo has been issued about what to do after the revocation of the need for CE. She insists that the MMDA has the right to apprehend our vehicles as colorum but she cannot justify it considering the new guidelines.

    I took a look at the MC's issued by the LTFRB and noticed the ambiguity:

    MC 2004-043 Issued 2004. Requires owners of trucks to apply for CPC and for private trucks to apply for certificate of exemption to operate their vehicles.

    MC 2009-013, Issued June 2009. Modified MC2004-043 by excluding the filing of Certificate of Exemption citing that the filing of exemption has been abused by haulers. Therefore, no certificate of exemptions will be issued.

    MC 2014-011. Once more allowed the issuance of Certificate of Exemption for Private trucks.

    MC 2014-014. Revokes 2014-11 so no more CE's will be given.

    In none of these memoes was it clear what private truck owners should do. This is the ambiguity that the MMDA and other officers are exploiting.

    Reply
  32. Unknown says:
    April 18, 2019 at 5:17 am

    Hi sir ask po may nabili kmi sasakyan 2016 na for hire NG tiwala kmi dhil d na din malayu sa knila NG ahente na pinsan ko din sabi in two mos lalabas agad Ang papel na for dropping na xa lahat NG orig need I surrender sa ltfrb plaka lahat Xerox lng meron kmi at original NG deed sale pero pinchek nmin d pala nmin ito pede ibyahe sa mga binigay na papel dapat meron kmi permit or certificate man lng na on going na papel sa ltfrb pero till now wala pa din short sir waiting lng kmi pinapasa nila kmi wala nman pinakita resibo man lng Di din nila agad ma labas papel ksi pina ayus nila ito sa cora na parang pixer nila ngyun denay nila kilala nila un

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Facebook
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
© 2025 the canDIshhh tales | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme